Mormon Fatherhood: Choice or Destiny?
Posted by david on August 10th, 2008
At the Sunstone Symposium this past week, panelists discussed the topic “Mormon Motherhood: Choice or Destiny?†where they talked about the October 2007 General Conference talk by Sister Julie B. Beck entitled “Mothers Who Know.â€Â It seems that discussions of gender and our divine nature and destiny often lead to debates about women and motherhood.
Rather than engage in that debate, I wanted to talk about a much less discussed aspect of our divine nature: A man’s role as husband and father. In “The Family: A Proclamation to the World,†the First Presidency declares, “By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide the necessities of life and protection for their families.â€
Women are not alone in holding specific divinely appointed duties in this life that may seem restricting. Men are charged with two primary responsibilities: Preside in love and righteousness and provide the necessities of life. These responsibilities effectively govern every waking moment of a man’s life and often demand great sacrifices.
Fathers have the duty to ensure that their family life “is founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ.â€Â Ancient prophets have commanded parents to teach their children to believe in Christ and to avoid contention. Modern prophets have counseled parents to hold Family Home Evenings, have family prayer every day, read the scriptures as a family, and teach our children the gospel of Jesus Christ. The Proclamation makes it clear that while “fathers and mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners,†the ultimate responsibility falls on the father to ensure these commandments are followed.
This awesome task demands daily effort and great sacrifice for decades. When children grow up, they will look to Heavenly Father as they look toward their earthly father. Men hardly have a more important task than to live in such a way that their children can look to God as a loving, gentle, and caring father who demands excellence but shows great mercy, who can handle the toughest problems but show interest in his child’s smallest activities, and who may seem to be away at times but will always return and provides a deep and abiding feeling of security.
Fathers also have the duty to “provide the necessities of life and protection for their families.â€Â This duty demands that fathers work for a living, in most cases outside the home. As a result, most faithful fathers will find themselves spending the majority of waking hours during the work week away from their families, in many cases working jobs that are difficult and provide no more fulfillment than the knowledge that they are putting bread on the table and keeping a roof over their family’s heads. While many men are fortunate to find jobs that they truly enjoy and find fulfilling, many more would rather spend their time in other pursuits. I fall in the latter category.
At the moment, I am blessed to have a good job that pays well, has decent hours, and matches my skillset and personality. However, in the past I have worked for a horrible boss or had jobs that caused great anxiety or required long hours. During those years, I frequently dreaded work and only did it because of my obligation to provide for my family. But even with the good job I have today, I would still much rather prefer to do a hundred other more fulfilling activities including being with my family.
In a sense, the life of the father ranks with the greatest tragedies in literature because the work he does in fulfillment of his patriarchal duty is the very thing which prevents him from being able to enjoy his family’s companionship, particularly during keys times in their lives. I suspect that many fathers have missed hearing a child’s first words, watching her take her first steps, sending him off on his first day of school, attending her birthday party, etc.
Despite this apparent tragedy, I take great comfort in knowing that on an eternal scale, this mortal existence is only a brief moment and that we will have the eternities to enjoy the close company of our families. My heavenly-defined role as a husband and father that seems restrictive from a mortal perspective is in reality truly liberating. I am grateful for the gospel of Jesus Christ that leads us as a family along the path to eternal life and exaltation where we will finally have the chance to pursue every righteous desire and interest.





Thanks for the reminder, and the perspective.
Comment # 1 left by Eric Nielson on August 10th, 2008
Fatherhood really is a choice. We recently had our fourth child, which is unusual in this part of the country, and I realize that my husband chooses to do this…..provide for his family and come home to us each night.
Last year I was explaining to my son the many reasons why a mother might have a job. When I got to divorce, I explained that “When a mom and dad get divorced, the dad no longer uses all of his money to take care of his family.” That really hit me. Right now, my husband has his paycheck deposited for the good of all of us.
These days, it is common for men to choose not to marry. Or choose not to stay married. Fatherhood is reduced to a child support check and every other weekend.
Being a husband and a father is very difficult. And nowadays there are so many cultural influences that make it even harder. It’s not all bad, our current culture does encourage fathers to interact with their children and participate in nurturing far more than previous generations.
Comment # 2 left by jks on August 10th, 2008
Thank you. I wish that most vocal women could discuss their duties in similarly faithful words.
Comment # 3 left by SilverRain on August 12th, 2008
growing up the duties of my father being to rule and work meant that after my dad would get home we would get spankings and sent to bed. though things got better over time, i still wish my dad was able to play a bigger part of my growing up besides the weekday ritual and saturday’s with dad.
in some ways i was lucky. in many families today our economy forces parents to work more hours through the week. while abiding to the ‘father works while mother cooks and cleans’ model of the 50’s. in many mormon households this model combined with the heavy requirements of priesthood callings can often leave the father as a largely absent figure in his child’s upbringing.
if possible, i think a dual-income option where both parents are able to work a minimal number of hours is far better than this beaver cleaver style that takes fathers away from the home and confines women to the kitchen and laundry room. it may work for some of middle-class america, but in what is supposed to be a global church, this supposed ideal is a far-fetched dream for most mormons today.
i have known several families who have been able to do minimal dual incomes and have loved it. it gave the father more time to be a dad instead of just an authority figure and gave the mothers an opportunity to find some fulfillment away from diapers and scrubbing floors.
now some may argue that such an ideal is great, but is also just as infeasible. true. however, this is where i feel the church ought to be directing its emphasis and political power. instead of wasting time on trying to prevent two people from loving each other, the church ought to place an emphasis on economic change, because that is where the true threat to the family lies.
Comment # 4 left by the narrator on August 13th, 2008