Blogger of Jared

The Dialogue of Revelation

Posted by jettboy on April 29th, 2007

One of the more interesting ideas in By the Hand of Mormon by  Terryl L. Givens is that the Book of Mormon introduces a form of revelation that is rejected by most Western religions. He states that almost all Christians have described the word “Revelation” as a metaphorical transmission of God’s revealing Himself. There is no actual concrete information that is given to a person who contacts the Divine entity. The argument seems to be that to claim a direct communication of actual words is to 1) ascribe anthropomorphism to God who is not human and 2) be open to fanaticism and heresy. However, the Book of Mormon explicitly introduces “dialogic revelation” as a true sign of faith and spiritual development. It should be part of the lives of everyone:

The Book of Mormon here becomes a study in contrast. Through chiastic form, thematic structure, numerous textual examples, and a final concluding instance of readerly invitation, the scripture hammers home the insistent message that revelation is the province of everyman. As a consequence, in the world of the Book of Mormon, concepts like revelation, prayer, inspiration, mystery find powerful and substantive redefinition. That may well be the Book of Mormon’s most significant and revolutionary – as well as controversial – contribution to religious thinking. The particularity and specificity, the vividness, the concreteness, and the accessibility of revelatory experience – those realities both underlie and overshadow the narrated history and doctrine that constitute the record. The “knowability” of all truth, the openness of mystery, the reality of personal revelation find vivid illustration within the record and invite reenactment outside it. (Givens, pg. 221)

This presents for Mormons a very strong challenge. It is not enough to simply feel good about spiritual experiences and consider us enlightened. Receiving revelation must take a step beyond the metaphorical and become literal.  As Joseph Smith explained, “A person may profit by noticing the first intimation of the spirit of revelation; for instance, when you feel pure intelligence flowing into you, it may give you sudden strokes of ideas, so that by noticing it, you may find it fulfilled the same day or soon.” (TJS, pg 151).  Ultimately, the purpose of “dialogic revelation” is to bring Salvation by bringing us into the very presence of God with the knowledge gained. Again, as Joseph Smith has said, no one can be saved in ignorance. This is more than a prescription to book learning, but direct instruction to search out Heavenly communication for our own eternal welfare. Indeed, it is the key to that most forgotten subject of much speculation; the Second Comforter.

It is often stated by Latter-day Saints that the return of Revelation and Prophets is the central originality of Mormonism.  What is perhaps less acknowledged is that personal revelation is as important a theological teaching as any corporate claim of authoritative pronouncements. Of course, it has been taught almost from the beginning that no revelation is accepted outside of a person’s authoritative jurisdiction.  That still leaves room for the equally necessary individual communication with the Divine. Despite what Givens says about the Bible having almost no discussion of personal revelation, Mormons often quote Numbers 11: 24-29 as instructive:

24  And Moses went out, and told the people the words of the LORD, and gathered the seventy men of the elders of the people, and set them round about the tabernacle.

25 And the LORD came down in a cloud, and spake unto him, and took of the spirit that was upon him, and gave it unto the seventy elders: and it came to pass, that, when the spirit rested upon them, they prophesied, and did not cease.

26 But there remained two of the men in the camp, the name of the one was Eldad, and the name of the other Medad: and the spirit rested upon them; and they were of them that were written, but went not out unto the tabernacle: and they prophesied in the camp.

27 And there ran a young man, and told Moses, and said, Eldad and Medad do prophesy in the camp.

28 And Joshua the son of Nun ,the servant of Moses, one of his young men, answered and said, My lord Moses, forbid them.

29 And Moses said unto him, Enviest thou for my sake? would God that all the LORD’s people were prophets, and that the LORD would put his spirit upon them!

With so much emphasis on Revelation, there is still less practical applications observable in the lives of Latter-day Saints. This is not to say that many don’t hold the concept in high esteem as theory. Yet, when asked what was the last revelation a person remembers having, many if not most Mormons would probably point to the time they gained a testimony or a missionary story.

Two possibilities are that revelation is not recognized when received or it is not easy to obtain. Considering the importance placed on communicating with God, it might be time to practice recognizing the intimations of the Spirit in a more “enthusiastic” tradition. Not a simple task, but essential to Salvation.

4 Responses to “The Dialogue of Revelation”

    You have brought up some interesting thoughts. I have not considered this, I will have to keep this in mind for future readings. For me personal revelation is usually a fairly vague and general feeling and rarely has much specific information involved.

    It seems an odd thing to expect more. The wind of the spirit seems to blow where it listeth. It is certainly not anything we can force to be the way we want it.

    Is it possible that there are some individuals (even prophets) that put words to the revelations that they receive? Is this perhaps a necessity of communicating such revelations? This may not necessarily be embelishment.

    Anyway, I will have to keep this in mind as I continue reading.

    Eric, prophets have (up to Harold Bloom who sees it more as subconscious rather than divine communication) been described as poets. You only need to read Dante, Milton, and William Blake to get an idea of the literary/revelatory connection. What that means is that they might hear a “voice” as one kind of revelation, but that doesn’t include a finalized form of words. Isaiah, for instance, is often recognized as the greatest judeo-Christian prophet and the most poetic with how he writes. I tend to agree that the two are connected as even the Bible seems to be associated with the “Word” and the “Divine Will” as the same thing.

    My own theory of the “poetic” rather than the “automaton” description of a prophet is that Joseph Smith was not against changing his own revelations. In fact, he was not above making grammatical or other mistakes in writing down his revelatory messages. It is this constant re-invisioning and re-interpreting the original divine manefestation that is both peculiar to and a scandal of Mormonism. Perhaps what we must do is put our feelings (and that might be why the focus on journal keeping) into words for a more robust examination of our revelatory experiences.

    As for visions, we have been taught one step at a time. Not to mention, they are rare occasions that are often accompanied by major eternal events of the Church or the individual. As you said, the Spirit that gives us revelations is far more “expressive” than we give it credit or imagine.

    A couple of years ago I had the kind of spiritual experience found in 3 Nephi 11:3

    “…it being a small voice it did pierce them that did hear to the center, insomuch that there was no part of their frame that it did not cause to quake…”

    and D&C 85:6

    “Yea, thus saith the still small voice, which whispereth through and pierceth all things, and often times it maketh my bones to quake while it maketh manifest…”

    This experience is more common than you might imagine. It is often referred to as “Kundalini Rising” or “Spiritual Emergence”. Google them if you would like to know more about it but please ignore all the new age hype.

    At that time I was blessed with a number of spiritual gifts including the constant companionship of the Spirit.

    I now enjoy a conversational relationship with the Spirit and personal revelation has become more or less continuous. It and ranges from the fairly vague to very vivid.

    Personal revelation, whether “general feelings” or “dialogic,” is a subject which we have in common with Evangelical and Pentecostal Christians.

    I believe if this commonality were to be explored more in our interactions with people of those faiths, we would receive more converts from those faiths.

Post a comment